Sourced Compiled and Edited by Paul Blanchard
Medical Consultant
OPPORTUNISTIC ILLNESS
|
There have been two major developments in the nutritional management of HIV-infected people and both are related to the application of potent combinations of antiretroviral agents: The prevalence and severity of severe malnutrition has declined sharply ov er the past two years. However, nutritional status may not return to normal in treated patients, but rather evolve to a condition characterised by the development of truncal obesity, associated with several metabolic alterations.
Nutritional And Metabolic Alterations Seen During Antiretroviral Therapy |
Truncal obesity |
Buffalo hump |
Enlarged supraclavicular fat pads |
Breast enlargement in women |
Decreased skinfold thickness in the arms, legs, and face |
Peripheral muscle wasting |
Low serum testosterone concentration |
Hypertriglyceridaemia |
Hypercholesterolaemia |
Hyperglycaemia |
Diabetes mellitus |
Hypertension |
ANTIRETROVIRALS
|
High doses of the antioxidant vitamins C and E may prevent the myopathy caused by mitochondrial damage associated with zidovudine therapy in HIV-positive patients, according to a report by Spanish researchers. They therefore suggest that antioxidant vitam in supplementation be a part of any treatment regimen that includes zidovudine.
"AIDS patients who receive zidovudine (ZDV, Retrovir symbol 212 "Symbol" 10 ' and component of Combivir symbol 212 "Symbol" s 10 ') frequently suffer from myopathy," Dr. Jose Vina and colleagues at the Universidad de Valencia point out in a paper to be published in the June 15th issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation . "This has been attributed to mitochondrial (mt) damage and specifically to the loss of mtDNA."
In the current study, Dr. Vina's group evaluated urine samples from 23 asymptomatic HIV-positive patients with an average age of 30 years who were receiving ZDV. They also evaluated HIV-positive subjects who had not been treated with ZDV and healthy controls. In addition, some of the ZDV-treated HIV-positive subjects were given antioxidant vitamin supplements for 1 month. The re searchers used urine levels of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) as a marker for DNA oxidative damage.
Compared with the untreated HIV-positive patients and the controls, Dr. Vina's group found that the ZDV-treated HIV-positive subjects had hig her urinary excretion levels of 8-oxo-dG. However, they also found that 8-oxo-dG excretion "...was prevented by simultaneous oral treatment with ZDV plus antioxidant vitamins (C and E)."
In addition, they noted similar effects in a mouse model. When they examined skeletal muscle mtDNA from ZDV-treated mice, they found higher levels of 8-oxo-dG compared with control mice. They also found that mitochondrial "...lipoperoxidation was...increa sed and skeletal muscle glutathione was oxidised." They believe that this may be "... due to an increased peroxide production by muscle mitochondria of ZDV-treated animals."
Based on these findings, Dr. Vina's group concludes that antioxidant supplementation "...with vitamins C and E at supranutritional doses protect against oxidative damage to skeletal muscle mitochondria caused by ZDV."
Ref: J Clin Invest 1998; June 15, 1998; 101 (12)
Source: CDC Daily News Update
Although true myopathy is now rare at current ZDV doses (250 - 300 mg bid) subclinical effects on mitochondri a may still be expected with ZDV use (these patients with raised 8-oxo-dG were asymptomatic). With such evidence of DNA oxidative damage in ZDV users but no myopathy it would now be useful to see if muscular function was affected. Studies of such markers as exercise tolerance, muscle fatigue and the effect of antioxidant vitamins should be performed to explore the clinical relevance of this damage. Doses of vitamins used in this study were not determined at publication date of this issue of Doctor Fax, bu t were stated to be supranutritional (ie. above recommended daily allowances). We will report doses used in our next issue after the JCI goes to press.
|
Eric Arts first aired this intriguing data on mechanisms of zidovudine (ZDV, Retrovir symbol 212 "Symbol" 10 ' and component of Combivir symbol 212 "Symbol" 10 ') resistance at the Resistance meeting last year (St.Petersburg 25-28 June 1997. Abstract 10. See ATP's DocFax Issue 27 ). His studied revealed that HIV, which has become resistant to ZDV displays faster reverse transcription rates overcoming the antiviral effects of ZDV. More worryingly, he also described such virus as having cross-resistance to other nucleoside analogues when in the presence of ZDV.
These results may explain why patients who have received prior treatment with ZDV and have M41V and/or T215Y mutated HIV respond less well to future combination therapy involving ZDV and another nucleoside analogue. |
Dr. Karen Tashima and colleagues at The Miriam Hospital, Brown University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University and The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company today announced that six HIV-infected patients taking the investigational drug efavir enz (Sustiva TM) in dual and triple combinations, achieved HIV RNA levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) below the level of detection (<400 copies/ ml).
CSF drug levels and HIV RNA were measured in these patients who took efavirenz in a combination either with ZDV and 3TC, or with indinavir, for a mean duration of 26 weeks. These data were presented at The 8th Annual Neuroscience of HIV Infection, Basic R esearch and Clinical Frontiers meeting sponsored by Northwestern University Medical School, June 3- 6, 1998.
Efavirenz levels were determined both in the CSF and in the plasma. Efavirenz levels in the CSF achieve d a mean concentration of 35.9nM. The CSF concentrations of efavirenz reflected the levels of free drug in the plasma (not bound to plasma proteins). Mean plasma viral load prior to treatment was 53,675 (range 2,985 to 108,778), and was reduced in all the six patients to below the level of detection, both in plasma and CSF at the time point studied. HIV RNA levels were evaluated using the standard Roche AmplicorTM HIV assay. Efavirenz is currently in development as a once- daily treatment and is availabl e in expanded access programmes in Europe. It is an antiretroviral of the NNRTI (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) class that also includes the licensed agent nevirapine.
Efavirenz is generally well tolerated; side effects include rash, nausea, dizziness, diarrhoea, headache and insomnia. Severe rashes have been reported in less than one percent of patients. Pregnant women should not take this new medication unless the b enefit to the mother clearly outweighs the potential risk to the foetus.
These data support both prior animal studies and the clinical evidence of patient experience (CNS effects - dizziness, vivid dreams, dysphoria would seem to indicate CNS penetration). However, it remains unclear to what extent the EFV is contributing to suppression in CSF, patients on dual NA's also saw VL in CSF fall to <400 copies/ml at 12 weeks (see below). EFV would be expected to add to the durability of such CSF viral suppression (these EFV data are out to a mean of 26 weeks). |
Researchers report that zidovudine or stavudine (d4T) taken in conjunction with lamivudine reduces cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 RNA concentrations. The researchers tested the HIV-1 RNA levels and drug concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of 28 antiretro viral-naive patients before and 22 individuals after 12 weeks of treatment with either zidovudine or stavudine plus lamivudine. They observed that HIV-1 RNA concen trations were undetectable in the central nervous system after 12 weeks of treatment with antiretrovirals and that drug concentrations were consistent over time. The authors note that "if these combinations can keep the rate of replication low in the lon g term, the prevention of HIV dementia is biologically plausible."
Ref: Lancet (23/05/98) Vol. 351, No. 9115, P. 1547; Foudraine, Norbert A.; Hoetelmans, Richard M.W.; Lange, Joep M.A.; et al.
Source: CDC Daily News Update
It should be noted that these dat a are only for 12 weeks of these double NA combinations and durability of viral suppression with 2 NA's is a major consideration. Double NA combinations are no longer recommended as adequate antiretroviral treatment. It is, however, encouraging that both ZDV/3TC and d4T/3TC appeared of equivalent potency in this compartment. |
Foscarnet, commonly used to treat AIDS-related cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, also decreases HIV-1 plasma load, according to two reports by European investigators published in the May 1st issue of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology.
In the first report, French researchers, led by Dr. Jean-Luc Pellegrin of the Hopital du Haut-Leveque in Pessac, evaluated the effects of foscarnet in 17 AIDS patients. The subjects also had CMV, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus infection, Kap osi's sarcoma or a combination of these conditions.
Dr. Pellegrin's team found that the subjects experienced decrease s from baseline in HIV-1 load of 0.73 log copies per millilitre after 3 days of foscarnet therapy and 1.15 log copies per millilitre after 10 days. "Furthermore, reduction of HIV-1 plasma load during foscarnet therapy did not depend on the presence or abs ence of CMV disease or on a positive pp65 antigenaemia at day 0."
Based on these data, Dr. Pellegrin's team concludes that foscarnet may be useful in lowering HIV-1 levels.
In the second paper, Dr. Bengt Jacobsson and colleagues at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden evaluated the effects of foscarnet in 10 HIV-1-positive patients who had no signs of CMV infection.
The patients received a 4-week course of 50 mg three times per day of intravenous foscarnet, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor "...that is a product analogue, in contrast to the widely used nucleoside analogues," they explain.
Dr. Jacobsson's group found that HIV-1 RNA levels "...decreased from a median value of 4.7 to 2.6 [log copies per millilitre]." This effect persisted throughout the treatm ent period, but HIV-1 RNA levels reverted to baseline 1 week after treatment was discontinued. They observed no increases in CD4+ cell counts.
All of the treated patients experienced side effects, which were severe in two. "Although the nephrotoxic effect of foscarnet is well known, only 1 patient had renal impairment after 23 days of treatment," they report.
Dr. Jacobsson's group concludes that foscarnet has a direct effect on HIV-1 replication. The "impressive decrease" in plasma HIV-1 RNA and the fact that foscarnet penetrates the blood-brain barrier, makes "...foscarnet a valuable alternative in the therapy for CMV infections in AIDS patients."
Ref: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998;18:46-53.
Source: CDC Daily News Update
The antiretroviral effect of foscarnet has been reported as early as the late 1980 s. The anti-HIV activity was thought important to a survival advantage seen in SOCA 1 (a trial for primary CMV treatment) although this was also questioned as an effect of a biased study population. SOCA 2 (a study of foscarnet for CMV relapse) did not show any survival benefit those patients receiving foscarnet. As an i.v. drug with long infusion times and an often high incidence of adverse effects it is unlikely to find clinical applica tion as an antiretroviral. Attempts to develop oral formulations have, so far, been unsuccessful. |
Some HIV-positive patients treated with triple-combination antiretroviral therapy may have an increase i n CD4 cell count without a significant decline in plasma HIV RNA, according to French researchers. Conversely, other HIV-positive patients may not experience an increase in CD4 cells despite a significant decrease in plasma HIV RNA.
In the May 7th issue of AIDS , Dr. Christophe Picketty of the Universite Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris and colleagues describe a prospective study of 162 HIV-positive patients. The subjects all had previous antiretroviral experience but were protease inhibitor naive. At baseline , the mean CD4 cell count was about 69/mL and the mean plasma HIV RNA level was 4.75 log 10 copies/mL.
Dr. Picketty's group found that most of the subjects, 57%, responded to triple-combination antiretroviral therapy with an increase in CD4 cell count and a decrease in viral load. However, after a mean of 10.5 months of follow-up, 17 subjects "...did not s how an increase in CD4 cell counts despite a significant decrease in plasma HIV RNA." Another 17 patients "...exhibited an increase in CD4 cell counts that did not differ in magnitude from that of responder patients, although they failed to show a significant decrease in HIV viral load throughout the follow-up period."
Dr. Picketty's group noted no differences in the frequency of AIDS-defining events between the patients with improved CD4 cell counts but no significant viral load decreases and the patients with both immunologic and virologic response.
They found that age, sex, CDC group, and baseline CD4 cell counts of less than 50mL were unrelated to discre pant responses, as were previous zidovudine monotherapy, extent of NRTI treatment before protease inhibitor therapy or the addition of a new nucleoside analogue within 30 days of the start of protease inhibitor therapy.
They believe that these findings "...raise critical questions with regard to when triple combination regimens should be changed in patients with advanced HIV disease who fail to respond to treatment, as assessed by measuring plasma HIV RNA levels."
Ref: AIDS 1998;12:745-750.
This study aga in emphasises that individuals respond individually to antiretroviral treatment and that such individual responses should be considered in treatment decisions. A mean 10.5 months of follow up with 17 vs. 145 patients makes it difficult to determine the s ignificance of these findings. |
Dr Eric Daar and colleagues report on the case of a 38 year old man who started antiretroviral treatment with ZDV + 3TC + ritonav ir on day 5 of an acute primary HIV-infection. Plasma HIV viral load prior to treatment was 5,600,000 copies/mL (6.75 log) but no HIV antibodies were detectable as seroconversion had not occurred at this early time point.
The patients plasma HIV viral load declined to undetectable levels (<500 copies/mL) with triple therapy. Additionally, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) activity and CD8+ cell activation was undetectable or minimal after 5 months treatment suggesting that earl y intervention negated cell mediated immune responses to the HIV.
After 6 months of treatment with various combination regimens, this patient elected to stop antiretroviral treatment due to adverse side effects. Thirty-five days later, he developed an acute illness that was indistinguishable from the acute retroviral sy ndrome. Viraemia rebounded to pre-treatment levels and memory CTL activity and high levels of CD8+ T-lymphocyte activation were detected.
The authors conclude that the second acute syndrome was likely the result of the supp ression of the primary infection at such an early stage with minimal establishment of any durable anti-HIV CTL activity. Viral replication on withdrawal of antiretrovirals was unchecked by the immune system and rapidly attained pre-treatment primary infec tion levels with the attendant clinical illness.
Ref: Annals of Internal Medicine, 15 May 1998. 128:827-829.
Report: Paul Blanchard, ATP.
PATHOGENESIS
|
CD4+ T cell activation, required for virus replication in these cells, occurs in local microenvironmental domains in transient bursts. Thus, although most HIV originates from short-lived virus-producing cells, it is unlikely that chronic infection is gene rally sustained in rapid continuous cycles of productive infection as has been proposed. Such continuity of productive infection cycles would depend on efficient long-range transmission of HIV from one set of domains to another, in turn requiring the maintenance of sufficiently high concentrations of cell-free virus across lymphoid tissues at all times. By contrast, long-lived cellular sources of HIV maintain the capacity to infect newly activated c ells at close range despite the temporal and spatial discontinuities of activation events. Such proximal activation and transmission (PAT) involving chronically and latently infected cells may be responsible for sustained infection, particularly when vira l loads are low. Once CD4 cells are productively infected through PAT, they can infect other activated cells in their immediate vicinity. Such events propagate locally but generally do not spread systemically, unlike in the acute phase of the infection, bec ause of the early establishment of protective anergy. Importantly, antiretroviral drug treatment is likely to differentially impact long-range transmission and PAT.
Ref: Zvi Grossman, Mark B. Feinberg, and William E. Paul. PNAS. Vol. 95, Issue 11, 6314-6319, May 26, 1998.
Might this suggest that antiretroviral compounds active in latently/chronically infected cell lines may be essential to long-term treatment success? Lymph-node work to be presented in Geneva may support this view (watch this space!) |
LETTERS
|
I would like to comment on the latest Dr Fax (issue 45 dated 15.05.98) which contains a section on the use of saquinavir soft gel capsules in combination with ritonavir. The last paragraph with which I take iss ue states that soft gel capsules of saquinavir are a rational alternative as part of a dual combination with ritonavir.
The position of Roche Products Ltd. is that this combination and indeed other double protease inhibitor (PI) regimens should be used with caution outside of clinical trials because there is as yet insufficient evidence of efficacy and safety.
The main reason in the past for using saquinavir in combination with a potent P450 inhibitor was to improve the bioavailability of saquinavir hard ge l capsules (Invirase) by blocking metabolism in the liver. However the current summary of product characteristics (SPC) for Invirase carries a statement that at this time there is insufficient data available on efficacy and safety of this co-administration. As no recommendation on dose and schedule for either of the compounds can be made, these drugs should not be used concomitantly . Moreover although there is a potential pharmacokinetic benefit with Invirase this is not the case with the soft gel form ulation (Fortovase) which provides much higher blood levels than Invirase on its own without the need for P450 inhibition. As Fortovase does not have a product licence in the UK the SPC for Invirase should be the reference guide for PI/PI combinations un til the current position changes.
The decision therefore to use Fortovase in combination with another protease inhibitor should be taken within the context of the benefit and risk to the patient. The acid-test for benefit should be whether two PIs together are more effective than either alone and this should be considered within the context of the potential risks of the combination. Currently we don t know the answer to the benefit question but we do know the potential risks, which include resistance to b oth PIs, interactions with other commonly prescribed drugs metabolized via P450 and the whole issue of lipodystrophy, which appears to be more common with PI combinations. Many of these points and arguments are contained in an article in Treatment Update from NAM entitled Double Dilemma (May 1998 Issue 65) which we recommend to your readers.
In summary we suggest that until there is more data from randomised trials showing that combinations of saquinavir and P450 inhibitors are safe and more effective than saquinavir alone, these combinations be reserved only for situations where there are no alternatives and certainly not for first line therapy.
Yours sincerely,
John Drake MB ChB FFPM
Medical Group Manager
Medical Adviser, HIV Focus
Welwyn Garden City, May 29, 1998
PK studies have shown no advantage in combining SGC saquinavir with ritonavir instead of HGC saquinavir. Saquinavir levels appear to be raised to a ceiling by ritonavir and the more bioavailable saquinavir formulation (Fortovase) will not raise them furth er (even if this were to be desirable). However, pricing of Fortovase is likely to make it considerably cheaper (per mg of saquinavir) than the currently available Invirase. Other issues apart from pricing will also affect both patients and cl inicians decisions about whether Invirase or Fortovase should be the saquinavir formulation to choose when combining with ritonavir. Indeed, Roche are yet to confirm if Invirase will even continue to be available after Fortovase is marketed. If it is, wil l the pricing be dropped to the equivalent price per mg of saquinavir in Fortovase? If Roche fails to act on pricing it will be market forces rather than data or safety concerns which determine the formulation of choice for combining with ritonavir. |